The Mediator of the New Covenant

Robert L. Millet

Robert L. Millet, "The Mediator of the New Covenant," in New Testament History, Culture, and Society: A Background to the Texts of the New Testament, ed. Lincoln H. Blumell (Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University; Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2019), 278-289.

Robert L. Millet is professor emeritus of Ancient Scripture at Brigham Young University.

Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners (1 Timothy 1:15). Because Adam and Eve transgressed by partaking of the forbidden fruit, they were cast from the Garden of Eden and from the presence of the Lord, resulting in spiritual death (i.e., separation from God). Consequently, blood, sweat, opposition, bodily decay, and, finally, physical death entered the world. Even though the Fall was a vital part of the great plan of the Eternal God[1]鈥攁s much a foreordained act as Christ鈥檚 intercession (1 Peter 1:20)鈥攐ur state, including our relationship to and contact with God, changed dramatically. The plight of the human family rested in the sobering truth that 鈥渁ll have sinned, and come short of the glory of God鈥 (Romans 3:23).

The Need for Mediation

All mortals desperately need help. Those who are lost need to be found. Those who are fallen need to be lifted up. Theologian John Stott has written that 鈥淐hristianity is rescue religion. It declares that God has taken the initiative in Jesus Christ to deliver us from our sins.鈥[2] Elder Boyd K. Packer reminded us painfully that 鈥渆ach of us, without exception, one day will settle [our] spiritual account. We will, that day, face a judgment for our doings in mortal life and face a foreclosure of sorts. . . . Each of us lives on a kind of spiritual credit. One day the account will be closed, a settlement demanded. However casually we may view it now, when that day comes and the foreclosure is imminent, we will look around in restless agony for someone, anyone, to help us.鈥[3]

Jesus was sent by the Father to show us the way back home. He is able to do so because he knows the way; indeed, he is the way (John 14:6). We can have total trust and confidence in him and rely completely upon his merits, mercy, and grace. This is what it means to have faith in Christ. We simply cannot be saved in our sins, nor can we merit anything of ourselves (Alma 11:37; 22:14). In the words of the Apostle Paul, 鈥渂y the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified鈥 (Romans 3:20; see 2 Nephi 2:5). Because of our fallen nature, we must be justified鈥攆orgiven, pardoned, and placed once again in a proper relationship with God our Heavenly Father. We cannot fix the damaged relationship on our own, but Jesus can. Through his advocacy and mediation he is able to effect a reconciliation with God. In short, God reconciles fallen men and women to himself by Jesus Christ (2 Corinthians 5:18).

President Joseph Fielding Smith explained that 鈥渁ll revelation since the fall has come through Jesus Christ, who is the Jehovah of the Old Testament. In all of the scriptures, where God is mentioned and where he has appeared it was Jehovah who talked with Abraham, with Noah, Enoch, Moses and all the prophets.鈥 Now note this important principle: 鈥The Father has never dealt with man directly and personally since the fall, and he has never appeared except to introduce and bear record of the Son.鈥[4] Hence, Jesus Christ is our mediator with God the Eternal Father.

A mediator is a 鈥済o-between鈥 person, an intermediary between two parties, an arbitrator, one who intervenes to resolve a conflict or, in some cases, to ratify a covenant. In the Old Testament, Abraham was a mediator between God and the corrupt people of Sodom and Gomorrah. In spite of their gross wickedness, he pleaded for divine mercy in their behalf鈥攖o spare them from destruction鈥攊f he could identify but ten righteous persons in those cities (Genesis 18:22鈥32). Moses also served as a mediator on behalf of the children of Israel. Jehovah declared that because of their wandering rebellion he would destroy the people and basically start all over.

After Moses discovered that the Israelites had built and worshipped a golden calf, he said to the people: 鈥淵e have sinned a great sin: and now I will go up unto the Lord; peradventure [perhaps] I shall make an atonement for your sin.鈥 Other translations render this passage as 鈥渟ecure pardon for your sin鈥 (Exodus 32:30, Revised English Bible) or 鈥渃lear you of your sin鈥 (Exodus 32:30, The Message: The Bible in Contemporary Language). Then, speaking to the Lord, Moses declared: 鈥淥h, this people have sinned a great sin, and have made them gods of gold (32:31).鈥 Now note this tender plea, a touching act of mediation: 鈥淵et now, if thou wilt forgive their sin鈥; and if not, blot me, I pray thee, out of thy book which thou hast written鈥 (Exodus 32:32; emphasis added).

The Epistle to the Hebrews opens as follows: 鈥God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; who being in the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high鈥 (Hebrews 1:1鈥3; emphasis added). John Stott observed that this passage 鈥渂rings together the two major spheres of mediation, in which God has taken action through Jesus Christ, which we usually call 鈥榬evelation鈥 and 鈥榬edemption.鈥 That is, God has both spoken to our ignorance through Jesus Christ, and dealt with our sins through Jesus Christ.鈥 Stott concluded that 鈥渋n the sphere of revelation Jesus was a prophet greater than Moses, and in the sphere of redemption he was a priest greater than Aaron.鈥[5]

The Mediator: Man, But More than Man

Jesus the Christ stands in a most unusual position as a member of the divine family of God. He had a dual inheritance. First, he was the son of Mary, and from her he inherited mortality, the flesh, including the capacity to die. Jesus needed to be mortal to understand and appreciate the challenges of being a human being. Indeed, 鈥渋n all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren鈥 (Hebrews 2:17). He went out into a fallen world and, day by day, encountered pain, affliction, temptation, infirmity, or weakness, 鈥渢hat his bowels may be filled with mercy, according to the flesh, that he may know according to the flesh how to succor his people according to their infirmities鈥 (Alma 7:11鈥12). Second, he was also the Son of God, the Almighty Elohim, and from him he inherited immortality, the capacity and power to live forever. The Lord stated it plainly when he taught: 鈥淭herefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down [through his mortal inheritance], and I have power to take it again [through his immortal inheritance]. This commandment have I received of my Father鈥 (John 10:17鈥18).

The Savior鈥檚 co-inheritance was absolutely necessary. Look carefully at the words of the angel to King Benjamin as he spoke of the condescension of Jehovah: 鈥淎nd lo, he shall suffer temptations, and pain of body, hunger, thirst, and fatigue, even more than man can suffer, except it be unto death鈥 (Mosiah 3:7; emphasis added) He also prophesied: 鈥淎nd lo, he cometh unto his own, that salvation might come unto the children of men even through faith on his name; and even after all this they shall consider him a man, and say that he hath a devil, and shall scourge him, and shall crucify him鈥 (Mosiah 3:9; emphasis added). Truly, Jesus of Nazareth was a man, but he was so much more than a man. Had he not had immortality within him, he could not have endured the suffering of Gethsemane and Golgotha, he could not have had the power to forgive sin and effect a mighty change in those who came to him by faith, he could not have raised himself from the tomb, from death to everlasting life.

Jesus Christ is holy. Charles E. Jefferson, Pastor of the Broadway Tabernacle in New York City in the early years of the twentieth century, wrote:

What do we mean by holiness? We mean wholeness, full-orbed perfection. . . . Let us think about the sinlessness of Jesus. . . .

The men who were nearest to [Jesus] got the idea that he was without sin. . . . Now these men were with Jesus. They ate with him, drank with him, slept with him, they saw him in all conditions and in all moods, and under varying circumstances. They saw him hungry, angry, stern, surprised, disappointed, amazed, yet they believed that in him there was no sin. . . .

The reason we are drawn to him is because we feel instinctively that he is far above us, a man without a sin. It is this which gives the Christian church its power. The Christian church has but one perfect possession, that is Jesus. The creed of the church is not perfect, its phrases were formed by the blundering mind of man. The Bible is not perfect, it is not inerrant, it has many a flaw. The church itself is imperfect, stained through and through with sin; but Jesus of Nazareth, the head of the church, is stainless. And because he is without sin, the church will come off triumphant.[6]

Nevertheless, Jesus was subject to temptation. It was possible for him to sin. The Son of God was not spared the tauntings, buffetings, and allurements of the father of lies; Jesus knew from firsthand experience that Lucifer was, as Joseph Smith explained, an 鈥渁ctual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being.鈥[7] Some have supposed that the Savior鈥檚 confrontation with Lucifer in the Judean desert following our Lord鈥檚 baptism was the extent of his temptation (Matthew 4:1鈥11; Luke 4:1鈥13). This is definitely not the case. It is the Gospel writer Luke who offered this point of clarity: 鈥淎nd when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season鈥 (Luke 4:13; emphasis added). Indeed, Jesus was 鈥渋n all points tempted as we are, yet without sin鈥 (Hebrews 4:15). 鈥淔or in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succor them that are tempted鈥 (Hebrews 2:18; see Doctrine and Covenants 62:1).

We know from scripture that some of the prophets like Noah (Moses 8:27) and Job (Job 1:1) were 鈥減erfect.鈥[8] That is, they were upright, whole, faithful, dependable before God, people of integrity, and steadfast in their quest to know the Lord and keep his commandments. Their lives were complete, and their faith in God was mature. Because we know they were human, however, we know also that they had at various times in their lives been guilty of sin, but had repented and been forgiven.

Jesus was different: we can say of him what can be said of no other person to inhabit earth鈥攈e was totally and completely innocent, had never taken a backward step, had never taken a moral detour, had never committed sin. In speaking to students at a Brigham Young University fireside, Elder Bruce R. McConkie stated: 鈥淲e have to become perfect to be saved in the celestial kingdom. But nobody becomes perfect in this life. Only the Lord Jesus attained that state, and he had an advantage that none of us has. He was the Son of God, and he came into this life with a spiritual capacity and a talent and an inheritance that exceeded beyond all comprehension what any of the rest of us was born with.鈥[9] In short, Jesus was in many ways just as we are. And yet he possessed innate powers, divine attributes, and heavenly qualities that no other mortal being possessed. Jesus himself said: 鈥淔or he whom God hath sent [speaking of himself] speaketh the words of God: for God giveth him not the Spirit by measure, for he [the Spirit] dwelleth in him, even the fullness鈥 (JST John 3:34; emphasis added). As Joseph Smith taught: 鈥淲here is the man that is free from vanity? None ever were perfect but Jesus; and why was He perfect? Because He was the Son of God, and had the fullness of the Spirit, and greater power than any man.鈥[10]

The Messenger of the Covenant

Jesus is our mediator in that he is the 鈥淢essenger of the Covenant.鈥 In speaking through Malachi, Jehovah proclaimed: 鈥淏ehold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the Lord of hosts鈥 (Malachi 3:1). One way of looking at the phrase 鈥淢essenger of the Covenant鈥 is to see Jesus as the preeminent Prophet, the great Word of the Father, the consummate dispenser of truth. Jesus was also a restorer in his day, a legal administrator, one charged by the Father to deliver priesthood powers and keys to his appointed servants. Joseph Smith taught that Jesus 鈥渨as greater than John [the Baptist], because He held the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood and kingdom of God, and had before revealed the priesthood of Moses.鈥[11] On another occasion the Prophet said, 鈥淛esus was then the legal administrator and ordained his apostles.鈥[12]

In other words, Jesus Christ was the Messenger of the gospel covenant. Joseph Smith revealed one of the grand truths of the Restoration when he explained that 鈥渢he kingdom of God was set up on the earth from the days of Adam to the present time. Whenever there has been a righteous man on earth unto whom God revealed His word and gave power and authority to administer in His name, and where there is a priest of God . . . , there is the kingdom of God.鈥[13]

One of the principal reasons for our Lord鈥檚 incarnation was to reveal the Father to men and women on earth. Jesus made it very clear that his Father is greater than he is (John 14:28); that 鈥渢here is none good but one, that is, God鈥 (Matthew 19:17); that God is the 鈥淔ather of lights鈥 (James 1:17); that he (Christ) came to earth to do the will of the Father (John 6:38); that the message of salvation is first and foremost 鈥渢he gospel of God鈥 (Romans 1:1; 1 Thessalonians 2:2, 8; 1 Peter 4:17); that the Father, through the Son, is reconciling the world to himself (2 Corinthians 5:18鈥20); and that God is in Christ, manifesting himself to the world (Hebrews 1:3; John 14:9).

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland taught that 鈥渋n all that Jesus came to say and do, including and especially in His atoning suffering and sacrifice, He was showing us who and what God our Eternal Father is like, how completely devoted He is to His children in every age and nation. In word and in deed Jesus was trying to reveal and make personal to us the true nature of His Father, our Father in Heaven.鈥 Elder Holland went on to explain that many Christians 鈥渇eel distant from the Father, even estranged from Him, if they believe in Him at all. And if they do believe, many moderns say they might feel comfortable in the arms of Jesus, but they are uneasy contemplating the stern encounter of God. . . . In that sense Jesus did not come to improve God鈥檚 view of man nearly so much as He came to improve man鈥檚 view of God and to plead with them to love their Heavenly Father as He has always and will always love them. The plan of God, the power of God, the holiness of God, yes, even the anger and the judgment of God they had occasion to understand. But the love of God, the profound depth of His devotion to His children, they still did not fully know鈥攗ntil Christ came.鈥[14]

Our Lord and Savior did not, however, come to earth simply to make known certain matters, as important as they are. He came, 鈥渘ot only to teach but to save, not only to reveal God to human beings, but also to redeem human beings for God. This is because our major problem is not our ignorance but our sin and guilt.鈥[15]

The Mediator of a Better Covenant

Following the translation of Moses, the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood were taken from the generality of the people and the Aaronic Priesthood became the priesthood of administration from the days of Aaron鈥檚 sons to the coming of John the Baptist, a period of almost a millennium and a half. As given in modern revelation, because the children of Israel 鈥渉ardened their hearts and could not endure his [Jehovah鈥檚] presence,鈥 the Lord 鈥渟wore that they should not enter into his rest while in the wilderness, which rest is the fulness of his glory. Therefore, he took Moses out of their midst, and the Holy Priesthood also鈥 (Doctrine and Covenants 84:24鈥25). William Clayton recorded the following remarks from Joseph Smith: 鈥淎ll priesthood is Melchizedek; but there are different portions or degrees of it. That portion which brought Moses to speak with God face to face was taken away; but that which brought the ministry of angels [the Aaronic] remained. All the prophets had the Melchizedek Priesthood and were ordained by God himself.鈥[16]

Spiritually unprepared Israel was given a lesser gospel, a preparatory gospel, including the laws and statutes of what we know as the law of Moses. This was 鈥渁 law of performances and of ordinances, a law which they were to observe strictly from day to day, to keep them in remembrance of God and their duty towards him鈥 (Mosiah 13:30). This preparatory or lesser gospel was thus administered by a lesser priesthood, the Priesthood of Aaron. When Jesus came, however, he restored the higher or Melchizedek Priesthood, and with it the everlasting gospel. In this final dispensation, the Savior declared, 鈥淏lessed are you for receiving mine everlasting covenant, even the fulness of my gospel, sent forth unto the children of men, that they might have life and be made partakers of the glories which are to be revealed in the last days鈥 (Doctrine and Covenants 66:2; see 1:22; 45:9; 49:9; 133:57).

Hence from the days of Moses to the coming of Christ the people were given the Mosaic covenant, and with the advent of the Lord came the new and everlasting covenant. It is everlasting in the sense that it was had from the beginning, as Joseph Smith taught. It is new at any given time in that it has been restored anew through the Lord鈥檚 authorized legal administrators. Therefore, some six hundred years before what we know as the meridian of time, God spoke through Jeremiah: 鈥淏ehold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers . . . , which covenant they brake, . . . but this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people鈥 (Jeremiah 31:31鈥33; emphasis added).

This prophecy was, of course, fulfilled with the coming of the Son of God, he who called all men and women under the Mosaic covenant to a higher righteousness, a righteousness consisting not of good deeds alone, but also a religion of the heart, as Jeremiah learned. In other words, the restoration of the everlasting gospel in the meridian of time made Jesus 鈥渢he mediator of a better covenant鈥 (Hebrews 8:6). Through the sufferings and death of Christ, there is effected a 鈥渞edemption [from] the transgressions that were under the first testament [covenant],鈥 and by this means 鈥渢hey which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance鈥 (Hebrews 9:15). In this manner, Jesus became the 鈥渕ediator of the new covenant鈥 (Hebrews 12:24).

Mediation through Prayer

A significant aspect of revealing God the Father to the people of earth is revealing how the children of God are to communicate meaningfully with the Father. The Savior himself was very clear regarding the order of prayer: we are to pray to God the Father in the name of Christ the Son. In his last supper, Jesus taught the Twelve: 鈥淎nd whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it鈥 (John 14:13鈥14; emphasis added). In describing the nature of their call and divine authorization, the Lord stated: 鈥淵e have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you鈥 (John 15:16, emphasis added; see 16:23鈥24, 26).

The risen Lord offered similar counsel to the Nephites when he explained, 鈥淭herefore ye must always pray unto the Father in my name鈥 (3 Nephi 18:19). And now note this vital qualification upon having those requests granted: 鈥淎nd whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, which is right, believing that ye shall receive, behold it shall be given unto you鈥 (3 Nephi 18:20, emphasis added; see 18:23, 30). The Savior then instructed his Nephite twelve to teach the same order of prayer to the people to whom they would minister: 鈥淎nd the twelve did teach the multitude; and behold, they did cause that the multitude should kneel down upon the face of the earth, and should pray unto the Father in the name of Jesus鈥 (3 Nephi 19:6). This same counsel has been offered to Latter-day Saints in modern revelation (Doctrine and Covenants 14:8; Moses 7:59).

Now, to say that we are to pray to our Father in heaven in the name of the Son is not to say that our prayers somehow go through Christ. The scriptures speak otherwise. To be sure, Christ is the way to the Father (John 14:6), and his is the only name by which salvation comes to the children of God (Acts 4:12); he is our Advocate with the Father, our Intercessor in the courts of glory. Our prayers, however, go directly to God our Father. Indeed, we are entitled to 鈥come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need鈥 (Hebrews 4:16; emphasis added).

Someone has noted that 鈥渁 true doctrine of the mediation of Jesus Christ is the ground of Christian assurance. Only when we come to God through Jesus Christ who died for us can we come with boldness instead of timidity, with confidence instead of fear.鈥[17] The great prophet Enoch, some three thousand years before Christ came to earth, was commanded to pray to the Father in the name of the Only Begotten Son; 鈥渢hou hast . . . commanded me that I should ask in the name of thine Only Begotten; thou hast made me, and given unto me a right to thy throne, and not of myself, but through thine own grace鈥 (Moses 7:59; emphasis added).

鈥淲e pray to the Father, not the Son,鈥 a modern apostle observed; 鈥渂ut according to the laws of intercession, advocacy, and mediation, our answers come from the Son.鈥 Or, stated in a slightly different way, 鈥減roper prayers are made to the Father, in the name of the Son, by the power of the Holy Ghost. The Father answers prayers, but he does it through the Son, into whose hands he has committed all things.鈥 Finally, proper prayers 鈥渁re not made to Moses, the mediator of the Old Covenant, nor to Jesus, the Mediator of the New Covenant, nor to the Holy Spirit of God.鈥[18] In summary, we pray to God, the Eternal Father, in the name of our Mediator Jesus Christ, and we strive to do so by the power of the Holy Ghost.

The Mediator Intercedes and Advocates

Earlier in this chapter I mentioned that no woman or man is saved by virtue of their own merits, deeds, or accomplishments, no matter how impressive they may be. We are saved because of the merits, mercy, and grace of Jesus Christ. Since he was perfect, having committed no sin and the law of justice having no claims upon him (Hebrews 7:26鈥27), the sinless one was in a unique position with regard to our Heavenly Father, the Man of Holiness (Moses 6:57). Jesus was and is in a position to make certain claims upon the Father, to request of the Almighty what no one of us would ever be in a position to request. His righteousness and holiness enabled and empowered him to be able to 鈥渃laim of the Father his rights of mercy which he [Christ] hath upon the children of men . . . For he hath answered the ends of the law, and he claimeth all those who have faith in him鈥 (Moroni 7:27鈥28; emphasis added). By faith in Jesus Christ, we who have been guilty of violating God鈥檚 law are in a position to lean upon and draw strength and forgiveness from the one who did in reality live that law perfectly. We are redeemed by the righteousness of our Redeemer (Romans 10:1鈥4; see also 2 Nephi 2:3).

For one thing, because of our Lord鈥檚 perfection and his complete faithfulness to the laws of God, he is able to extend his righteousness to us. Now whether a person believes that Jesus imputes his righteousness to us (a Protestant perspective, a legal declaration describing one鈥檚 standing before God) or imparts his righteousness to us (a Roman Catholic perspective describing an actual change in one鈥檚 state or nature), or some of each, as in numerous Protestant-Catholic rapprochements since the Second Vatican Council, what is abundantly clear in the scriptures is that our Savior can change us, can both elevate our standing before God and sanctify our soul. Christ 鈥渋s able also to save them to the uttermost [perfectly] that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them鈥 (Hebrews 7:25; emphasis added). In speaking of those who inherit the celestial kingdom, the revelation states, 鈥淭hese are they who are just men [and women] made perfect through Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, who wrought out this perfect atonement through the shedding of his own blood鈥 (Doctrine and Covenants 76:69; emphasis added). Thus, people who come unto Christ with full purpose of heart are 鈥減erfected in him鈥 (Moroni 10:32).

The Apostle Paul explained that 鈥渋f any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ . . . For he [God the Father] hath made him [Christ] to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him鈥 (2 Corinthians 5:17鈥18, 21). This is what New Testament scholars and Christian leaders have through the years called the 鈥済reat exchange鈥 or the 鈥済reat reversal.鈥 In addition, however, Paul is explaining that Jesus came to earth to exchange with us. It is as though the Redeemer says to each of those who yearn for cleansing and for rest: 鈥淐ome unto me and I will take your sin. On the other hand, I will convey my righteousness to you.鈥

What an exchange! The late Roman Catholic scholar Richard John Neuhaus put it this way: 鈥淚t was not simply that [Jesus] bore the consequences of sin, but . . . he was made to be sin [see 2 Corinthians 5:21, above]. The great reversal reverses all of our preconceptions.鈥 Now note the following significant insight: 鈥God must become what we are in order that we might become what God is. To effectively take our part, he must take our place.鈥 Also, Christ 鈥渂ecame what by right he was not, so that we might become what by right we are not. This is what Christians through the ages have called the 鈥榟appy exchange.鈥 This exchange, this reversal, is at the very epicenter of the story of our redemption.鈥[19]

One Christian theologian, Donald Bloesch, described the continuing nature of the exchange in this way: 鈥淭he exchanged life is an ongoing reality and not simply a change in our status before God. It is characterized by the substitution of Christ鈥檚 humility for our vanity, his courage for our fear, his love for our bitterness, his power for our weakness, his holiness for our sin.鈥[20]

One of the most moving and instructive models or analogies used by the prophets to explain the Messiah鈥檚 saving labor is the law court setting. We are guilty of offenses against the law, and Jesus Christ offers to serve as our defense attorney. 鈥淢y little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not,鈥 declared John the Beloved. 鈥淏ut if any man sin and repent, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous鈥 (JST 1 John 2:1). Note the following inspired language of the Prophet Joseph Smith from the dedicatory prayer of the Kirtland Temple: 鈥淭hou art gracious and merciful, and wilt turn away thy wrath when thou lookest upon the face of thine Anointed鈥 (Doctrine and Covenants 109:53). 鈥淚 am Christ,鈥 the Lord said in an earlier revelation, 鈥渁nd in mine own name, by the virtue of the blood which I have spilt, have I pleaded before the Father for them鈥 (Doctrine and Covenants 38:4; emphasis added).

Jesus was fully human, meaning there was nothing about his human nature or his divine powers that would prevent him from experiencing all of the trials and traumas, the disappointments and delights of mortality. In addition, he was an infinite and eternal being (Alma 34:14) possessed of perfect love for each of us, which allowed him to have perfect empathy. 鈥淲herefore in all things it behoved [Christ] to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succor them that are tempted鈥 (Hebrews 2:17鈥18; see Alma 7:11鈥13; Doctrine and Covenants 62:1).

Ours, however, is definitely a different kind of law court. Normally the defense might seek to provide evidence that the accused had a sterling reputation in the community, that the crime for which he is charged is simply incongruous with the esteem with which he is held by those who know him best, that over a period of thirty years he has built a solid and enviable reputation as a city councilman, Little League coach, Scout leader, and volunteer fireman. But what would we make of a defense attorney whose opening remarks went something like the following: 鈥淵our honor, I would recommend most strongly, in order to save the time of the court and the money of taxpayers, that this charge be dismissed.鈥 The judge might answer, 鈥淥n what grounds?鈥 The attorney鈥檚 reply: 鈥淏ecause of my outstanding record as a defense attorney!鈥 The judge: 鈥淐ome again.鈥 鈥淲ell, your honor,鈥 the confident advocate continues, 鈥淚 think if you check my record you will see clearly that I have never lost a case. I am an outstanding lawyer. I really do think it would be wise to dismiss these proceedings.鈥

Now if the defense attorney was not fined heavily for contempt of court, he would certainly be laughed out of the courtroom. Perhaps both. Why? Because the innocence or guilt of the accused is absolutely unrelated to the competence or effectiveness of his lawyer. In fact, one of the reasons why the Savior鈥檚 Atonement can be described as 鈥渋nfinite and eternal鈥 is that it defies human (mortal) law and logic. The touch of Jesus鈥檚 hand, the depth and breadth and unspeakable power of his mediation, defies what you and I understand about justice and mercy and right and wrong and restitution and punishment. Turning briefly to the Book of Mormon, we note Amulek鈥檚 words to the errant Zoramites: 鈥淚t is expedient that there should be a great and last sacrifice; yea, not a sacrifice of man, neither of beast, neither of any manner of fowl; for it shall not be a human [mortal] sacrifice; but it must be an infinite and eternal sacrifice. Now there is not any [typical mortal] man that can sacrifice his own blood which will atone for the sins of another. Now, if a man murdereth, behold will our law, which is just, take the life of his brother? I say unto you, Nay. But the law requireth the life of him who hath murdered; therefore there can be nothing which is short of an infinite atonement which will suffice for the sins of the world鈥 (Alma 34:10鈥12; emphasis added).

C. S. Lewis has written: 鈥淎mong [the] Jews there suddenly turns up a man who goes about talking as if He was God. He claims to forgive sins. He says He has always existed. He says He is coming to judge the world at the end of time. . . . Now unless the speaker is God, this is really so preposterous as to be comic. We can all understand how a man forgives offenses against himself. You tread on my toes and I forgive you, you steal my money and I forgive you. But what should we make of a man, himself unrobbed and untrodden on, who announced that He forgave you for treading on other men鈥檚 toes and stealing other men鈥檚 money? . . . He told people that their sins were forgiven, and never waited to consult all the other people whom their sins had undoubtedly injured. He unhesitatingly behaved as if He was the party chiefly concerned, the person chiefly offended in all offenses. This makes sense only if He really was the God whose laws were broken and whose love is wounded in every sin.鈥[21]

Conclusion

鈥淭he fundamental principles of our religion,鈥 Joseph Smith taught, 鈥渁re the testimony of the Apostles and Prophets, concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven; and all other things which pertain to our religion are only appendages to it.鈥[22] That singular principle puts everything else into proper perspective. If there had been no Atonement of Jesus Christ, it would matter precious little to know that we lived before we were born into mortality, that all those who do not have an opportunity to hear the message of salvation in this life will have that privilege in the postmortal spirit world, that there are degrees of glory hereafter, that through those keys of the priesthood known as the sealing power, families may be linked and bound together everlastingly. In other words, if there had been no Atonement, no amount of good on our part or no deep and profound doctrine could make up for the loss. 鈥淪alvation could not come to the world,鈥 the Prophet Joseph declared, 鈥渨ithout the mediation of Jesus Christ.鈥[23]

Elder Boyd K. Packer spoke of these solemn matters in a related way. 鈥淭ruth, glorious truth, proclaims there is . . . a Mediator,鈥 he testified. 鈥淭hrough him mercy can be fully extended to each of us without offending the eternal law of justice.鈥 Now notice what Elder Packer had to say about this key doctrine: 鈥This truth is the very root of Christian doctrine. You may know much about the gospel as it branches out from there, but if you only know the branches and those branches do not touch that root, if they have been cut free from that truth, there will be no life nor substance nor redemption in them.鈥[24] In other words, Christ is the divine center: his life and atoning sacrifice, his advocacy and mediation, together with his bodily resurrection from the dead, give meaning and purpose to everything else we do and believe.

Because God our Heavenly Father devised a plan for the regeneration of fallen mortals, we can have hope. Because, as an essential part of that great plan of happiness, Jesus the Redeemer was sent to earth to provide a system of redemption and reclamation for all who would receive it, we can rejoice. And because he has bridged the divide between fallen, mortal humanity and a holy, glorified, and exalted God, our souls can rest.

Further Reading

Bloesch, Donald. Jesus Christ: Savior and Lord. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1997.

Brown, Raymond E. The Death of the Messiah, 1:117-234. New York: Doubleday, 1994.

Holland, Jeffrey R. "Where Justice, Love, and Mercy Meet." Ensign, May 2015.

---. "None Were with Him." Ensign, May 2009.

McConkie, Bruce R. "The Purifying Power of Gethsemane." Ensign, May 1985.

Millet, Robert L. The Atoning One, 59-96. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2018.

Stott, John. Life In Christ. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, 1991.

Notes

[1] Elder Orson F. Whitney taught, 鈥淭he Fall had a twofold direction鈥攄ownward, yet forward. It brought man into the world and set his feet upon progression鈥檚 highway.鈥 Cowley and Whitney on Doctrine, comp. Forace Green (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1963), 287.

[2] John Stott, Basic Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), 81.

[3] Boyd K. Packer, 鈥淭he Mediator,鈥 Ensign, May 1977, 54鈥55.

[4] Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954), 1:27; emphasis added.

[5] Johm Stott, Life in Christ (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, 1991), 12.

[6] Charles E. Jefferson, The Character of Jesus (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1908), 326, 331, 332鈥333, 334.

[7] Joseph Smith鈥擧istory 1:16.

[8] In KJV Job 1:1, Job is described as 鈥減erfect,鈥 but other translations translate the original word as 鈥渂lameless鈥 (e.g., New Revised Standard Version).

[9] Bruce R. McConkie, 鈥淛esus Christ and Him Crucified,鈥 1976 BYU Devotional Speeches of the Year (Provo, UT: BYU Press, 1977), 399; emphasis added.

[10] Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 2007), 53; emphasis added; cited hereafter as Joseph Smith.

[11] Joseph Smith, 83.

[12] The Words of Joseph Smith: The Contemporary Accounts of the Nauvoo Discourses of the Prophet Joseph, ed. Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook (Provo, UT: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1980), 235; punctuation corrected.

[13] Joseph Smith, 82.

[14] Jeffrey R. Holland, 鈥淭he Grandeur of God,鈥 Ensign, November 2003, 70鈥71; emphasis added..

[15] Stott, Life in Christ, 16.

[16] Words of Joseph Smith, 59.

[17] Stott, Life in Christ, 18.

[18] Bruce R. McConkie, The Promised Messiah: The First Coming of Christ (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1978), 335, 557, 558; emphasis added.

[19] Richard John Neuhaus, Death on a Friday Afternoon: Meditations on the Last Words of Jesus from the Cross (New York: Basic Books, 2000), 30, 31鈥32; emphasis added.

[20] Donald Bloesch, Jesus Christ: Savior and Lord, Christian Foundations series (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1997), 160.

[21] C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (New York: Touchstone, 1996), 55.

[22] Joseph Smith, 49; emphasis added.

[23] Joseph Smith, 48.

[24] Packer, 鈥淢ediator,鈥 56; emphasis added.